NB 跑鞋

mc

ching 對 NB 既跑鞋有咩comment?

好唔好著?

我見佢出既size 大d 好似易d買到鞋

我依家有一對rider 11 同adizero

佐治男孩

原帖由 smchan2 於 2009-8-31 12:47 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

ching 對 NB 既跑鞋有咩comment?

好唔好著?

我見佢出既size 大d 好似易d買到鞋

我依家有一對rider 11 同adizero

只穿過它的901和903.算是可以吧,買的主要原因是大減價.好平.而且這個型號在美國算是輕的訓練鞋.美國人胖,鞋通常比較重,難找輕的.不知道在香港有沒有.
不過現在改穿Brooks,你可以看看Brooks的Launch, Ravenna,Defyance等鞋.Racing flat我就是穿T6

econecon

原帖由 佐治男孩 於 2009-8-31 13:00 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

只穿過它的901和903.算是可以吧,買的主要原因是大減價.好平.而且這個型號在美國算是輕的訓練鞋.美國人胖,鞋通常比較重,難找輕的.不知道在香港有沒有.
不過現在改穿Brooks,你可以看看Brooks的Launch, Ravenna,De ...

Brooks邊度有得買?

econecon

原帖由 smchan2 於 2009-8-31 12:47 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

ching 對 NB 既跑鞋有咩comment?

好唔好著?

我見佢出既size 大d 好似易d買到鞋

我依家有一對rider 11 同adizero

我買斷碼所以買左NB MR749, 呢對原價係650元既鞋

我覺得對鞋都幾好著 冇乜痛. 都用黎跑左170km以上對鞋

如果平平地二百五(我係呢個價買)買到真係抵著既,所以都唔理個款即買

佐治男孩

原帖由 econecon 於 2009-8-31 15:32 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Brooks邊度有得買?

我以前(二十多年前)在香港時是在銅鑼灣馬拉松買的,現在看web上說下面可以買到.
The Gateway
                            25 Canton Road
                            T.S.T. Kowloon, Hong Kong
                            Tel: 852-2110-2210

一般跑友都可以用T6跑到半馬.輕或efficient的跑手可以穿它來跑全馬
若果比較重,或跑法沒太efficient,可以穿ST4
Lightweight trainer可以用Launch
跑track比賽可以穿Nerve LD

[ 本帖最後由 佐治男孩 於 2009-9-1 00:57 編輯 ]

econecon

原帖由 佐治男孩 於 2009-9-1 00:38 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

我以前(二十多年前)在香港時是在銅鑼灣馬拉松買的,現在看web上說下面可以買到.
The Gateway
                            25 Canton Road
                            T.S.T. Kowloon, Hong Kong
          ...

thx 點解呢個品牌係香港做唔起呢..

佐治男孩

原帖由 econecon 於 2009-9-1 02:04 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

thx 點解呢個品牌係香港做唔起呢..

公司小，不做廣告，沒有贊助很多大牌跑手。要在香港推銷，廣告是很重要的。
但Brooks大概是唯一一家只做跑步產品的運動公司。

blurmax

I found my NB 901 very durable and quite comfortable but a little bit heavy.

However my new RT800 was much lite and comfortable just the same!

By the way the price of NB is much cheaper than Asics and Mizuno too.

I will continue to wear Asics, NB and Adidas (Mizuno and Nike were out)

http://hk.myblog.yahoo.com/blurmax

佐治男孩

原帖由 blurmax 於 2009-9-1 08:53 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

I found my NB 901 very durable and quite comfortable but a little bit heavy.

However my new RT800 was much lite and comfortable just the same!

By the way the price of NB is much ch ...

Believe it or not, lightweight shoes are very hard to find here in US because most recreational runners here are heavy.  And they need heavily cushioned shoes.  901 was the lightest NB shoes I could find in the outlet here. I got about 600 miles (~960k) per pair, which was not too bad.

But now I am going to replace them with Brooks Launch.

econecon

原帖由 blurmax 於 2009-9-1 08:53 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

I found my NB 901 very durable and quite comfortable but a little bit heavy.

However my new RT800 was much lite and comfortable just the same!

By the way the price of NB is much ch ...

點解Ching唔再著美記既?

blurmax

Just feel the mileage of Mizuno is not enough and have to retire quickly

econecon

原帖由 blurmax 於 2009-9-1 16:48 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Just feel the mileage of Mizuno is not enough and have to retire quickly

原來係咁, 即係唔襟著啦

咁你覺得最耐用一般係邊個牌子?

三間, NB 定Asics? Asics特別貴不過

blurmax

To my experience NB is most durable.  I just bought my 1st Asics so could not make any comment now.

http://hk.myblog.yahoo.com/blurmax

佐治男孩

原帖由 blurmax 於 2009-9-1 22:44 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

To my experience NB is most durable.  I just bought my 1st Asics so could not make any comment now.

http://hk.myblog.yahoo.com/blurmax

People here would make a case that the American brands (NB, Brooks) except Nike are more durable than the others like Asics, Mizuno.  It is kind of the opposite of cars.

econecon

原帖由 佐治男孩 於 2009-9-1 23:44 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

People here would make a case that the American brands (NB, Brooks) except Nike are more durable than the others like Asics, Mizuno.  It is kind of the opposite of cars.

一定有理由既